Archives as enablers of researchPäivi Happonen | 16.1.2020Combining the open availability of data and data protection is a central challenge for archives in the coming years. Read more »
Only accessible information belongs to everyoneResponsible Research editors | 10.1.2020The production of accessible content and services is in everyone’s interests – and also a requirement specified in law. Read more »
How to reach the public in science communicationIngrid Torp | 20.11.2019How do you bring your knowledge to the public? Read more »
How should researchers view the societal impact of their work?Arto Mustajoki | 14.11.2019A researcher can reflect on their own engagement with society through some ethical considerations. Read more »
Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and SciencesJohanna Enqvist | Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö | 30.8.2019The Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences is an online service and tool for the production and publishing of information. Read more »
Who is the researcher of the future?Henrik Rydenfelt | 4.9.2018What will the researcher’s role be if one day machines perform most of the current research tasks? Read more »
Science advice as part of responsible science and researchPäivi Tikka | 24.8.2018The responsible researcher and responsible research should operate in interaction with the rest of society. Read more »
Seeking the experts of the futureMikko Jakonen | 20.8.2018In decision-making, attention should be paid to up-to-date expert information in all its diversity. Read more »
Science and political decision-making – the Parliament of Finland’s Committee for the Future Olli Hietanen | 20.8.2018There is much less objective information in the world that we might think. What we do find is a number of well-founded alternative viewpoints. Read more »
Bold communication, responsible influence. Science communication recommendationsResponsible Research editors | 8.6.2018The Committee for Public Information in Finland has formulated national recommendations for science communication. Read more »