English
Suomi
Svenska
Planning
Finnish research system in a nutshell
Research plan
Research permits and ethical reviews
Conflicts of interest
Doing research
Responsible conduct of research and dealing with misconduct
Formal and normative regulations
Ethical practices needed in research
Support for researchers
Publishing
Academic publishing
Science and research communication
Authorship
Reuse
Evidence-informed decision-making
Reuse of research data
Topics
Authors
Site map
Glossary
About us
Topics
Animals
Animal experiments and laboratory animals
Business collaboration
Open science and commissioned research
A research integrity check-list in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences for research conducted in cooperation with companies
Business collaboration in non-medical research with human participants
Communication
How to reach the public in science communication
How should researchers view the societal impact of their work?
Guidelines and codes for publishing
Communication as part of responsible conduct of research
Bold communication, responsible influence. Science communication recommendations
Why should researchers engage in public debate?
The researcher as the target of hate speech
Social media as a researcher’s workplace
Communicating science to different audiences
Science and the news media are united by striving for truth
Five days and one night of science
Conflicts of interest
Researchers’ conflicts of interest
Copyright
Do you use social media data in your research?
Publishing an article-based dissertation
Legislation and research conduct
A publisher’s view of authorship
Responsible research and the use of images
Artistic freedom and the rules of research
Data
Expert ethical online research
Safeguard the anonymity of research subjects!
What is a data management plan?
Data protection
Do you use social media data in your research?
Data protection tools for researchers
Legislation and research conduct
The researcher’s dilemma: copyright and data protection
Responsible historical research and data protection
Responsible research and the use of images
Open science and research ethics
Expert ethical online research
Safeguard the anonymity of research subjects!
Effects and impact of research
Archives as enablers of research
Only accessible information belongs to everyone
How to reach the public in science communication
How should researchers view the societal impact of their work?
Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences
Who is the researcher of the future?
Science advice as part of responsible science and research
Seeking the experts of the future
Science and political decision-making – the Parliament of Finland’s Committee for the Future
Bold communication, responsible influence. Science communication recommendations
What is social impact?
Why should researchers engage in public debate?
Social media as a researcher’s workplace
Communicating science to different audiences
Researched information to support decision-making at national level
Ethical review
Who gives consent in research on children and young people?
Ethics committees at universities of applied sciences
When does research require an ethical review?
Ethical review in Finland
Who to contact? Ethical advisory boards in Finland
Medical research ethics in Finland
Find out whether you need a permit for your research
Freedom of speech
Why should researchers engage in public debate?
The researcher as the target of hate speech
Human sciences
Legislation and research conduct
Responsible historical research and data protection
A research integrity check-list in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences for research conducted in cooperation with companies
Ethics committees at universities of applied sciences
When does research require an ethical review?
Ethical review in Finland
Business collaboration in non-medical research with human participants
Internet
Communication as part of responsible conduct of research
The researcher as the target of hate speech
Social media as a researcher’s workplace
Expert ethical online research
Legislation
Only accessible information belongs to everyone
Legislation and research conduct
The researcher’s dilemma: copyright and data protection
Who to contact? Ethical advisory boards in Finland
Animal experiments and laboratory animals
Medical research
Legislation and research conduct
When does research require an ethical review?
Ethical review in Finland
Who to contact? Ethical advisory boards in Finland
Medical research ethics in Finland
Open science
The FAIR principles underpin good quality in research
Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences
Open science is changing the practices of peer review
Responsible research and the use of images
Open Science Resource: an online course in open science
Open science and research ethics
Open co-authorship of scientific articles
Peer review
Open science is changing the practices of peer review
The peer-review label aids transparency and consistency
Good conduct guarantees the quality of peer review in science
Plagiarism
Self-plagiarism – how it can be avoided and why repeating yourself may also benefit research
A publisher’s view of authorship
Guidelines and codes for publishing
Responsible conduct of research
Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research
Artistic freedom and the rules of research
Citing digital research data – give credit where credit is due
Publishing
Only accessible information belongs to everyone
Responsible use of Publication Forum classification
Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences
Open science is changing the practices of peer review
Publishing an article-based dissertation
Agreeing on authorship: recommendation for research publications
Guidelines and codes for publishing
The peer-review label aids transparency and consistency
10 facts about Publication Forum
Science and the news media are united by striving for truth
Research integrity and research ethics
Research ethics – a guarantee of quality in the Horizon programme
Pre-emptive research ethics
Guidelines and codes for publishing
A research integrity check-list in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences for research conducted in cooperation with companies
Ethical guidelines and codes
Online course in research integrity
A framework for self-regulation in research integrity: the Finnish model, step by step
The ethics and risks of dual use research
Open science and research ethics
Teaching and learning research integrity
Research integrity is learned in PhD supervision
What is a data management plan?
Research metrics
Responsible use of Publication Forum classification
Research misconduct
The investigation of research misconduct in Finland
Responsible conduct of research
Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research
Citing digital research data – give credit where credit is due
Responsible conduct of research
Archives as enablers of research
The investigation of research misconduct in Finland
Self-plagiarism – how it can be avoided and why repeating yourself may also benefit research
Guidelines and codes for publishing
Communication as part of responsible conduct of research
Ethical guidelines and codes
Research Integrity Advisers assist the research community in Finland
Responsible conduct of research
Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research
Template for researcher's curriculum vitae
A framework for self-regulation in research integrity: the Finnish model, step by step
Good behaviour spreads joy – and is productive
Artistic freedom and the rules of research
Citing digital research data – give credit where credit is due
Science and the news media are united by striving for truth