Responsible use of Publication Forum classificationEeva Savolainen | Janne Pölönen | 23.9.2019The evaluation of research should be based primarily on expert evaluation at unit and researcher level. Read more »
Open science is changing the practices of peer reviewRiitta Jytilä | Mikael Laakso | 5.8.2019The purpose of open peer review is to improve scientific communication and publishing practices. Read more »
Publishing an article-based dissertationAnna-Sofia Ruth | 29.7.2019Commonness of article-based dissertations means that universities need more competence related to publishing practices and copyright. Read more »
Open science and commissioned research Perttu Pohjola | 24.8.2018In commissioned research, the interests of the scientific community and the business world may pull in different directions,...Read more »
Guidelines and codes for publishingResponsible Research editors | 12.7.2018Links to guidelines and codes for responsible publishing. Read more »
The peer-review label aids transparency and consistencyAnna-Sofia Ruth | 19.5.2018The peer-review label in a publication shows that the text has been peer reviewed in line with generally accepted quality and ethical requirements. Read more »
How to avoid predatory publications?Anna-Sofia Ruth | 19.5.2018Predatory publishers charge a fee from authors but fail to perform the duties of an academic publisher. Read more »
10 facts about Publication ForumAnna-Sofia Ruth | 19.5.2018Publication Forum (JUFO) is a classification system to support the quality assessment of research output. Read more »
Good conduct guarantees the quality of peer review in sciencePauliina Raento | 19.5.2018In peer review of scholarly manuscripts, authors, editors, and expert reviewers share responsibility for the success of the process. Read more »
Personal ORCID IDs for researchersAntti-Jussi Nygård | 16.5.2018ORCID provides each researcher with their own unique ID code, which helps to clearly determine the researcher’s authorship. Read more »
