Site map

Tulostettava sivu
English

Planning
Finnish research system in a nutshell
Who to contact? Ethical advisory boards in Finland
Finnish higher education system
A framework for self-regulation in research integrity: the Finnish model, step by step
Research plan
Template for researcher's curriculum vitae
The ethics and risks of dual use research
What is a data management plan?
Research permits and ethical reviews
Research ethics – a guarantee of quality in the Horizon programme
Who gives consent in research on children and young people?
Ethics committees at universities of applied sciences
When does research require an ethical review?
Ethical review in Finland
Animal experiments and laboratory animals
Medical research ethics in Finland
Find out whether you need a permit for your research

Doing research

Conflicts of interest
Researchers’ conflicts of interest
A research integrity check-list in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences for research conducted in cooperation with companies
Business collaboration in non-medical research with human participants
Responsible conduct of research and dealing with misconduct
The investigation of research misconduct in Finland
Self-plagiarism – how it can be avoided and why repeating yourself may also benefit research
Research Integrity Advisers assist the research community in Finland
Responsible conduct of research
Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research
Good behaviour spreads joy – and is productive
Teaching and learning research integrity
Research integrity is learned in PhD supervision
Formal and normative regulations
Data protection tools for researchers
Legislation and research conduct
The concept of copyright differs from the research integrity concept of authorship
Ethical practices needed in research
Do you use social media data in your research?
Who is the researcher of the future?
Responsible historical research and data protection
Open science and research ethics
Responsible citizen science
Expert ethical online research
Citing digital research data – give credit where credit is due
Support for researchers
Pre-emptive research ethics
Responsible research and the use of images
Ethical guidelines and codes
Online course in research integrity
Open Science Resource: an online course in open science

Publishing
Academic publishing
Responsible use of Publication Forum classification
Open science is changing the practices of peer review
Publishing an article-based dissertation
Open science and commissioned research
Guidelines and codes for publishing
The peer-review label aids transparency and consistency
How to avoid predatory publications?
10 facts about Publication Forum
Good conduct guarantees the quality of peer review in science
Personal ORCID IDs for researchers
Science and research communication
How to reach the public in science communication
How should researchers view the societal impact of their work?
Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences
Communication as part of responsible conduct of research
Bold communication, responsible influence. Science communication recommendations
The researcher as the target of hate speech
Social media as a researcher’s workplace
Multisensory science communication: science centres as a bridge between science and society
Communicating science to different audiences
Science and the news media are united by striving for truth
Communicating science can take time: textbooks and other professional literature
Five days and one night of science
Authorship
Agreeing on authorship: recommendation for research publications
The researcher’s dilemma: copyright and data protection
A publisher’s view of authorship
Checklist for participants in a research project to agree authorship
Artistic freedom and the rules of research
Open co-authorship of scientific articles

Reuse
Evidence-informed decision-making
Only accessible information belongs to everyone
Science advice as part of responsible science and research
Seeking the experts of the future
Science and political decision-making – the Parliament of Finland’s Committee for the Future
What is social impact?
Why should researchers engage in public debate?
Researched information to support decision-making at national level
Reuse of research data
Archives as enablers of research
The FAIR principles underpin good quality in research
Safeguard the anonymity of research subjects!